Leans Traditional
6.6
The Surrender
(2025)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
16 Millimeter Earrings (1966)
16 Millimeter Earrings (1966)
Overview
Not to be confused with Robert Withers's 1979 "16 Millimeter Earrings" which builds upon this work, Meredith Monk's 1966 "16 Millimeter Earrings" is a black and white film of a woman holding a magnifying glass to each eye and tearing apart several wigs.
Starring Cast
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Viewer Rating
Not Rated
Overview
Not to be confused with Robert Withers's 1979 "16 Millimeter Earrings" which builds upon this work, Meredith Monk's 1966 "16 Millimeter Earrings" is a black and white film of a woman holding a magnifying glass to each eye and tearing apart several wigs.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
Screen Test [ST2]: Charles Aberg is rated 0 because its central subject matter—a silent, unedited portrait of an individual—is inherently apolitical, focusing on human presence and the act of observation rather than any specific socio-political issue or ideology.
This film, a static portrait of a single individual, features a traditional subject without any explicit diversity in casting or character roles. Its observational nature provides no narrative or framing that critiques traditional identities or explicitly promotes DEI themes.
Secondary
Andy Warhol's 'Screen Test [ST2]: Charles Aberg' is a silent, unedited portrait. The film lacks narrative, dialogue, or explicit thematic content regarding LGBTQ+ identity. Consequently, no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes are depicted, leading to an N/A rating.
Meredith Monk's experimental film '16 Millimeter Earrings' does not feature identifiable transsexual characters or themes. Its abstract and non-narrative structure explores broader concepts of identity and performance, rather than specific gender identities or transitions.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film is a direct screen test of the real-life individual Charles Aberg, who is portrayed as male, consistent with his historical gender. There is no instance of a character established as one gender being portrayed as another.
The film is a direct portrait of Charles Aberg, a real person, who portrays himself. There is no established prior canonical or historical depiction of Charles Aberg as a different race.
More Like This
Leans Traditional
8.3
The Elephant Man
(1980)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
Mickey's Christmas Carol
(1983)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
First Blood
(1982)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.5
High Noon
(1952)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
The African Queen
(1952)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
The World's Fastest Indian
(2005)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Positive
Traditional
7.9
Jeremiah Johnson
(1972)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
The Sting
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.7
Phone Booth
(2003)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Sleeper
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.6
Strangers on a Train
(1951)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
6.9
Fall
(2022)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.8
The Apartment
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Maggie Simpson in "Playdate with Destiny"
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
PAW Patrol: The Movie
(2021)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
6.6
Brothers
(2009)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
The Last Unicorn
(1982)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
When I Grow Up
(1951)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.8
3:10 to Yuma
(2007)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low