2.0
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Apartment Wife: Sexuality White Paper (1984)
Apartment Wife: Sexuality White Paper (1984)
Overview
"Apartment Wife" pink film distributed by Okura Eiga.
Starring Cast
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Viewer Rating
2.0
Overview
"Apartment Wife" pink film distributed by Okura Eiga.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film's title suggests an analytical exploration of sexuality and marital dynamics. Without specific plot details or narrative outcomes, it is impossible to determine if it champions a particular ideological solution or critique, leading to a neutral assessment.
This 1971 Japanese film features traditional casting for its cultural context, primarily with Japanese actors, and does not incorporate intentional race or gender swaps. The narrative focuses on its specific themes without explicitly critiquing traditional identities or centering on modern DEI themes.
Secondary
Based on available information, 'Apartment Wife: Sexuality White Paper' does not feature identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Therefore, its portrayal of LGBTQ+ elements is classified as N/A.
Based on the information provided, no identifiable transsexual characters or themes are present in 'Apartment Wife: Sexuality White Paper'. Therefore, an evaluation of its portrayal is not applicable.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This film is an original story within the 'Apartment Wife' subgenre of Japanese cinema. There are no indications of it being an adaptation of source material with pre-established characters, nor does it feature legacy characters from prior installments whose gender was altered.
The film "Apartment Wife: Sexuality White Paper" is a 1984 Japanese production. There is no indication of prior source material, historical figures, or earlier adaptations that would establish a canonical race for its characters before this film's release. Therefore, no character could have been portrayed as a different race than previously established.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
N/A
2.0
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
6.8
Legend of the Galactic Heroes: Golden Wings
(1992)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Flying Colors
(2015)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.2
Case Closed: The Fourteenth Target
(1998)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
7.6
One Piece Film Red
(2022)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Neutral
Female Combat: Yes
Center
8.0
When Marnie Was There
(2014)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
7.3
Dragon Ball Z: Broly - The Legendary Super Saiyan
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
Rodan
(1956)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.1
Avalon
(2001)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.2
Always: Sunset on Third Street 2
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
7.0
Detective Conan: The Lost Ship in the Sky
(2010)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Female Combat: Yes
Center
8.7
Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba - Entertainment District Decisive Battle Arc
(2023)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Female Combat: Yes
Leans Traditional
6.9
Atashin'chi the Movie
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Doraemon the Movie: Nobita's Little Star Wars 2021
(2022)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Doraemon: Nobita in the Wan-Nyan Spacetime Odyssey
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
9.2
Seven Samurai
(1954)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
7.4
Kingdom
(2019)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Female Combat: Yes
Leans Traditional
6.7
Doraemon: Nobita and the Birth of Japan
(2016)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Weathering with You
(2019)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Shin Ultraman
(2022)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
Dolls
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low