Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

Better Watch Out (2017)
On a quiet suburban street tucked within a 'safe neighborhood', a babysitter must defend a twelve-year-old boy from strangers breaking into the house, only to discover that this is far from a normal home invasion.
On a quiet suburban street tucked within a 'safe neighborhood', a babysitter must defend a twelve-year-old boy from strangers breaking into the house, only to discover that this is far from a normal home invasion.
The film's central subject matter of psychopathy and home invasion horror is largely apolitical, focusing on individual depravity rather than systemic issues or political ideologies. It does not explicitly promote or critique any specific political viewpoint.
The movie features a traditional cast with no explicit race or gender swaps of established roles. Its narrative focuses on genre-specific thrills and character-driven horror, without engaging in explicit DEI themes or offering a critical portrayal of traditional identities.
The film 'Better Watch Out' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative centers on a home invasion thriller, and queer identity is not a component of its story or character arcs.
The film 'Better Watch Out, 2017' does not depict any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The narrative focuses on a home invasion thriller without incorporating elements related to transsexual identity or experiences, thus receiving an N/A rating.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Better Watch Out is an original film, not an adaptation of existing source material or a reboot with legacy characters. All characters were created for this specific movie, meaning there is no prior canonical gender to swap from.
Better Watch Out (2017) is an original film, not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established character races or historical figures. Therefore, its characters are new, and no race swap can occur per the definition.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























