5.9
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders II (1980)
Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders II (1980)
Overview
This sequel to the highly-rated 1979 TV movie provides another fictionalized behind-the-scenes glimpse at the comely squad and the pressures put on them as they face another Super Bowl and an upcoming USO tour.
Starring Cast
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Viewer Rating
5.9
Overview
This sequel to the highly-rated 1979 TV movie provides another fictionalized behind-the-scenes glimpse at the comely squad and the pressures put on them as they face another Super Bowl and an upcoming USO tour.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film's subject matter and narrative primarily focus on apolitical themes of personal ambition, competition, and individual achievement within an entertainment context, rather than engaging with explicit political ideologies.
The movie's casting aligns with traditional portrayals, featuring a mainstream demographic without explicit race or gender swaps of established roles. The narrative maintains a neutral or positive framing of traditional identities, avoiding critical portrayals or central DEI themes.
Secondary
The film 'Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders II' does not feature any discernible LGBTQ+ characters or themes within its narrative. The story centers on the lives of the cheerleaders without incorporating queer identities or experiences.
The film 'Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders II' does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. Consequently, there is no portrayal to assess regarding transsexual identity or experiences within the narrative.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film is a sequel focusing on the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, who are historically and canonically female. There is no evidence of any established character from the prior installment or real-world history being portrayed as a different gender.
The film is a fictionalized sequel about a cheerleading squad, not an adaptation of a work with racially defined characters or a biopic of specific historical figures. There is no indication that any character canonically established as one race was portrayed by an actor of a different race.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
4.9
7.0
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
7.4
Dexter's Laboratory: Ego Trip
(1999)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
The Pentagon Wars
(1998)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.1
While We're Young
(2015)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Dog
(2022)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
6.9
Quartet
(2012)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Hello, My Name Is Doris
(2015)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Garfield Goes Hollywood
(1987)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.5
Sylvia Scarlett
(1935)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
6.6
Mickey Saves Christmas
(2022)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Rocky Mountain Holiday with John Denver and the Muppets
(1983)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Cyrano
(1974)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
Magic Mike
(2012)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
Tiny Toon Night Ghoulery
(1995)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Hail, Caesar!
(2016)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
6.9
A Flintstone Christmas
(1977)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.1
Plus One at an Amish Wedding
(2022)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
Arthur Christmas
(2011)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
The Jetsons Meet the Flintstones
(1987)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
The Way
(2010)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.8
Tell It to the Marines
(1926)
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low