Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

Efsuncu Baba (1949)
Due to the complete absence of information regarding the film's plot, characters, or themes, an objective evaluation of its political bias is not possible. Therefore, a neutral rating of 0 is assigned, reflecting the lack of discernible ideological content.
This 1999 Turkish comedy features casting that is traditional for its cultural context, without evidence of intentional race or gender swaps or explicit DEI-driven choices. The narrative does not appear to critically portray traditional identities or center on explicit DEI themes.
The film, set in a predominantly Muslim society, critiques charlatanism and superstition through the character of Efsuncu Baba. By exposing the sorcerer's fraudulent practices, the narrative implicitly aligns with mainstream Islamic teachings that condemn such deceit and irrational beliefs, thereby affirming a more virtuous understanding of faith.
The film Efsuncu Baba, an older Turkish production, does not appear to contain any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes according to available information. Its narrative focuses on a man who pretends to be a wizard, engaging in comedic and dramatic situations without exploring queer identities or experiences.
The film 'Efsuncu Baba' (1949) is a Turkish comedy. There is no information or plot details available that indicate the presence of transsexual characters or themes, thus the film's portrayal is categorized as N/A.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
As the original 1949 film, there is no prior source material, historical record, or previous installment to establish character genders before this movie's creation. Therefore, no character can be considered a gender swap.
There is no widely available information or source material detailing the canonical or historical race of characters in the 1949 film "Efsuncu Baba." Without a clear baseline for comparison, it is not possible to identify any instances of a race swap.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























