Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

It's Arbor Day, Charlie Brown (1976)
Charlie Brown's team is forced to play against Peppermint Patty's in their field that has been converted into a lush garden.
Charlie Brown's team is forced to play against Peppermint Patty's in their field that has been converted into a lush garden.
The film promotes basic environmental stewardship and community participation through the celebration of Arbor Day, presenting these themes in a universally positive and apolitical manner without aligning with a specific political ideology.
This animated special features the classic Peanuts characters in a story centered around Arbor Day. The casting adheres to the traditional depictions of these well-known characters, and the narrative focuses on environmental themes without engaging in explicit DEI discussions or critiques of traditional identities.
This animated special does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative centers on Charlie Brown's baseball team and their efforts to celebrate Arbor Day, focusing on childhood experiences and environmental awareness without addressing queer identity.
This animated special does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The narrative centers entirely on environmentalism, friendship, and the Peanuts gang's Arbor Day activities, thus rendering the portrayal of transsexual identity as not applicable.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This animated special features established Peanuts characters, all of whom maintain their canonical genders as depicted in the original comic strip and prior adaptations. No characters originally established as one gender are portrayed as a different gender.
This animated special features the established Peanuts characters, including Franklin, who was introduced as a Black character in 1968. All characters maintain their canonical racial depictions from the original comic strip and prior animated works.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























