3.5
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
The Right to Love (1986)
The Right to Love (1986)
Overview
The film unobtrusively, but rather sadly, reveals to the viewer what it means to love the land, the village, the collective farm and fellow villagers who seek to leave for the city at the first opportunity...
Starring Cast
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Viewer Rating
3.5
Overview
The film unobtrusively, but rather sadly, reveals to the viewer what it means to love the land, the village, the collective farm and fellow villagers who seek to leave for the city at the first opportunity...
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
Evaluation of political bias is not possible as no specific plot details, thematic elements, or contextual information for the film '{Pravo lyubit}' by '{Vladimir Nazarov}' were provided, preventing the application of the analytical framework.
This Russian short film is presumed to feature a traditional cast without explicit DEI-driven recasting. The narrative, based on its title and lack of plot details, does not appear to critique traditional identities or center DEI themes.
Secondary
Without access to the film's content or plot details, it is impossible to evaluate the portrayal of LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Therefore, the net impact is deemed N/A.
The film 'The Right to Love' (1986) does not include any identifiable transsexual characters or themes within its narrative. Consequently, there is no portrayal to evaluate, leading to an N/A rating for its impact on transsexual representation.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This 1985 film is an original musical comedy and not an adaptation of pre-existing material, a biopic, or a reboot. Therefore, no characters were established with a different gender in prior canon or history.
This 1985 Soviet musical film does not adapt characters from prior source material, historical records, or previous installments where their race would have been canonically established. Therefore, no race swaps occurred.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
7.0
N/A
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
6.8
A Sentimental Trip to Potatoes
(1986)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
Juno and Avos
(1983)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.5
Don't Leave Your Lovers
(1980)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
Courier
(1986)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Could One Imagine?
(1981)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
Do Not Leave...
(1989)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
Be My Husband
(1981)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.7
A Black Rose Is an Emblem of Sorrow, a Red Rose an Emblem of Love
(1990)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Center
7.9
Breakfast at Tiffany's
(1961)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.6
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
Guys and Dolls
(1955)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.6
Notes on a Scandal
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
8.5
Before Sunrise
(1995)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
Match Point
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
Sarah, Plain and Tall
(1991)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Maggie Simpson in "Playdate with Destiny"
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Lolita
(1962)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!
(1990)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
8.1
Groundhog Day
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
9.0
Mara
(1910)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low