Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

We Were Dangerous (2024)
Nellie, Daisy and Lou attend an institution for delinquent girls on an isolated island in 1954. The trio rail against the system, finding strength in their friendship but this is challenged when the school's matron divides them.
Nellie, Daisy and Lou attend an institution for delinquent girls on an isolated island in 1954. The trio rail against the system, finding strength in their friendship but this is challenged when the school's matron divides them.
The film's central thesis explicitly promotes progressive ideology by critiquing colonialism, patriarchy, and institutional abuse, emphasizing systemic oppression and the importance of collective resistance and empowerment among marginalized communities.
The movie features a cast intentionally chosen to represent diverse racial and socioeconomic backgrounds, with a particular focus on authentic Māori representation. Its narrative critically examines systemic inequities, portraying how traditional power structures and societal norms lead to differential treatment based on race, class, and sexuality, making these DEI issues central to its story.
The film portrays LGBTQ+ themes through Lou, a queer character facing institutional oppression for her sexuality. While acknowledging societal challenges, the narrative centers on the powerful acceptance and solidarity Lou finds among her friends, affirming queer identity and highlighting the importance of chosen family and resilience against discrimination.
The 2024 film *We Were Dangerous* features Lou, a transsexual protagonist, whose portrayal is notably affirming. Despite a period setting and initial societal labeling, Lou is depicted with dignity, agency, and is fully accepted by her friends. The narrative emphasizes authenticity and inclusion, focusing on her journey and relationships within a supportive peer group, rather than on marginalization or prejudice. The film's overall impact is positive, normalizing trans identity.
The film portrays institutional Christianity as a tool for colonial control, assimilation, and abuse of Indigenous girls. It critiques how religious doctrine was weaponized to justify oppression and systemic cruelty, without offering significant counterbalancing positive portrayals of the faith.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film's characters are original or based on historical themes, not specific individuals with established genders. The female protagonists are consistently portrayed as female, with no indication of any character's gender differing from source material or historical record.
The film's casting aligns with the established ethnic and phenotypical identities of its characters and the historical context of 1950s New Zealand. All major characters are portrayed by actors matching their described race, with a deliberate effort to maintain authenticity.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























