Leans Traditional
7.7
A Shot in the Dark
(1964)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
What the Curate Really Did (1905)
What the Curate Really Did (1905)
Overview
Some gossiping women blow the priest’s gift to a little girl out of proportion.
Starring Cast
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Christianity: Negative
Viewer Rating
Not Rated
Overview
Some gossiping women blow the priest’s gift to a little girl out of proportion.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
This film is rated neutral due to the complete lack of specific plot details, making any objective assessment of political bias impossible. The historical context of a 1906 silent film about a curate suggests a focus on individual morality or social dynamics rather than modern ideological conflicts.
This early 20th-century film reflects the traditional casting and narrative conventions of its era. Its representation primarily features mainstream actors, and the storyline does not engage with critiques of traditional identities or explicit diversity, equity, and inclusion themes.
Secondary
The film satirizes the hypocrisy of a Christian clergyman, depicting a curate engaging in un-clerical behavior. This comedic exposé critiques the institution or its representatives by highlighting their human failings, thus casting a negative light on the public religious role.
This early silent comedy from 1906 does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its narrative focuses on a curate's humorous predicaments, typical of slapstick films from that era, without engaging with queer identity in any capacity.
The film "Barnens dag 1905" is a historical short from 1905 depicting children's day activities. There are no identifiable transsexual characters or themes present within the narrative, making an evaluation of portrayal inapplicable.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film features a male curate, consistent with the historical and canonical understanding of the role. There is no evidence of any character established as one gender being portrayed as another.
This 1905 film is an original production, not an adaptation of existing material or a biopic. There are no prior canonical or historical racial depictions for its characters to be compared against, thus no race swap can be identified.
More Like This
Leans Traditional
7.6
Guys and Dolls
(1955)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.5
Pretty Woman
(1990)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
When Harry Met Sally...
(1989)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
Evil Dead II
(1987)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.8
Ratatouille
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Sleeper
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
Lethal Weapon
(1987)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
7.0
The Pink Panther
(1963)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
The War of the Roses
(1989)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
The Simpsons Movie
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Groundhog Day
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Little Miss Sunshine
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Traditional
7.2
Liar Liar
(1997)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Maggie Simpson in "Playdate with Destiny"
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
The Sting
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.8
The Apartment
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
PAW Patrol: The Movie
(2021)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
8.3
Roman Holiday
(1953)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Lamp Life
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low