Leans Traditional
7.2
Little Vampire
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
An Eye for an Eye (1951)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Viewer Rating
Not Rated
Overview
Mimiche feuds with his nameless unshaven nemesis.
Starring Cast
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Christianity: Positive
Judaism: Positive
Overview
Mimiche feuds with his nameless unshaven nemesis.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film explores the complex concept of 'an eye for an eye' by examining the moral ambiguities and societal implications of retribution and personal vengeance, without explicitly promoting a specific ideological solution or critique.
Based solely on the provided title and director, and without any specific details regarding the movie's casting, character diversity, or narrative themes, no explicit Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion elements could be identified. The evaluation assumes a traditional approach in the absence of any information suggesting otherwise.
Secondary
The film portrays characters who misinterpret Christian teachings to justify vengeance, but the narrative ultimately critiques this literalism. It subtly affirms the broader Christian message of forgiveness and compassion by showing the destructive consequences of its misapplication.
While the film features the 'eye for an eye' principle, it explores its complex interpretations within Judaism, contrasting literal vengeance with rabbinic traditions emphasizing monetary compensation. The narrative thus affirms the nuanced and ethical depth of Jewish law, even when characters might initially misrepresent it.
Based on the information provided, no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes were present in the context given for the film "An Eye for an Eye". Therefore, an evaluation of its portrayal is not applicable.
Based on the provided input, there is no information to indicate the presence of transsexual characters or themes in 'Two Girls Named Smith' (1951), resulting in an N/A rating for portrayal.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
No information indicates that 'An Eye for an Eye' (1951) features characters whose gender deviates from their canonically, historically, or widely established portrayals.
There is no widely established prior canon or historical record for characters in the 1951 film "An Eye for an Eye" to compare against its on-screen portrayals. Therefore, no race swap can be identified.
More Like This
Leans Traditional
7.4
A Monster in Paris
(2011)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
Asterix: The Secret of the Magic Potion
(2018)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
The Triplets of Belleville
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Asterix and the Vikings
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
The Little Prince
(2015)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.2
Scooby-Doo! Stage Fright
(2013)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Dexter's Laboratory: Ego Trip
(1999)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Bluetoes, the Christmas Elf
(1988)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.6
Toy Story 2
(1999)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
A Good Marriage
(1982)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Pooh's Heffalump Movie
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.7
Foe Paws
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Lamp Life
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Steamboy
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
There's No Time for Love, Charlie Brown
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.7
The Odyssey
(1987)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Crusher Joe
(1983)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
7.5
The Jungle Book
(1967)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Curious George
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low