7.9
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Breakfast at Tiffany's (1961)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Center
Viewer Rating
Rating: 7.9
Overview
Holly Golightly is an eccentric New York City playgirl determined to marry a Brazilian millionaire. But when young writer Paul Varjak moves into her apartment building, her past threatens to get in their way.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Race Swap: Yes
Overview
Holly Golightly is an eccentric New York City playgirl determined to marry a Brazilian millionaire. But when young writer Paul Varjak moves into her apartment building, her past threatens to get in their way.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Center
Primary
The film's central conflict and resolution are primarily focused on individual character development and romantic themes, rather than promoting or critiquing a specific political ideology. It explores personal growth and the search for genuine connection, which are largely apolitical.
The film features a largely traditional main cast without intentional diversity-driven casting choices. Its narrative does not critique traditional identities or incorporate explicit DEI themes.
Secondary
The character Mr. Yunioshi, canonically Japanese in Truman Capote's novella, is portrayed by Mickey Rooney, a white actor, in the film. This constitutes a race swap.
The film "Breakfast at Tiffany's" does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes within its narrative. Its primary focus is on the romantic relationship between Holly Golightly and Paul Varjak, with no explicit representation of queer identities or experiences.
Breakfast at Tiffany's does not include any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The narrative focuses on other aspects of its characters' lives and relationships, with no depiction of transgender identity.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The 1961 film adaptation of Truman Capote's novella maintains the established genders of all its main characters. No character canonically male or female in the source material is portrayed as a different gender in the film.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
7.5
7.6
Critic Ratings
8.8
7.7
More Like This
Leans Traditional
7.8
Sabrina
(1954)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
Roman Holiday
(1953)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
How to Steal a Million
(1966)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
Love in the Afternoon
(1957)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
Operation Petticoat
(1959)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
Charade
(1963)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
On a Clear Day You Can See Forever
(1970)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Hello, My Name Is Doris
(2015)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Traditional
8.3
Manhattan
(1979)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
7.9
High Fidelity
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
The Good Girl
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
9.0
City Lights
(1931)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Groundhog Day
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
Lost in Translation
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Garden State
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
7.9
Big
(1988)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.1
Sleepless in Seattle
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.2
Forrest Gump
(1994)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.5
Meet Me in St. Louis
(1944)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Where the Boys Are
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low