3.6
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Going Under (1991)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Center
Viewer Rating
Rating: 3.6
Overview
An American submarine races to get a nuclear weapon before a Russian submarine.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Overview
An American submarine races to get a nuclear weapon before a Russian submarine.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Center
Primary
The film satirizes the absurdity of Cold War tensions and military bureaucracy, portraying both American and Soviet characters with equal parts folly and humanity. Its focus on general incompetence and comedic resolution, rather than a specific ideological solution or critique, positions it as neutral.
The movie features visible diversity within its supporting cast, but does not appear to engage in explicit race or gender swaps of traditionally white roles. Its narrative, typical for a 1990s comedy, does not explicitly critique traditional identities or center on DEI themes.
Secondary
The film 'Going Under' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes within its plot. The narrative centers on a comedic submarine crew and their mission, without engaging with queer identity in any capacity, leading to a determination of N/A for its portrayal.
The film "Going Under" (1991) is a comedy centered on a nuclear submarine crew. Based on available plot summaries and character information, there are no identifiable transsexual characters or themes present in the narrative, resulting in no depiction to evaluate.
The film "Going Under" is a comedy primarily set on a nuclear submarine. There are no significant female characters depicted engaging in or winning close-quarters physical combat against male opponents within the narrative.
Going Under (1991) is an original film and not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established characters. Therefore, no characters exist from a prior canon or historical record to undergo a gender swap.
Going Under (1991) is an original film and not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established character races, nor is it a biopic. Therefore, no characters existed prior to this film with a canonically or historically defined race that could be altered.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
3.5
3.7
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
6.6
Independence Day
(1996)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Progressive
6.7
No Time to Spy: A Loud House Movie
(2024)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Positive
Female Combat: Yes
Center
6.9
Spy Kids
(2001)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Female Combat: Yes
Center
7.8
Kung Fu Panda
(2008)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Female Combat: Yes
Leans Traditional
7.2
Thunderbolt and Lightfoot
(1974)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World
(1963)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Progressive
6.8
Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle
(2017)
Political: Center
Diversity: High
Female Combat: Yes
Leans Progressive
7.7
Deadpool
(2016)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Neutral
Female Combat: Yes
Progressive
7.7
The Suicide Squad
(2021)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: High
LGBTQ: Neutral
Female Combat: Yes
Center
7.4
The Bad Guys
(2022)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Female Combat: Yes
Center
7.2
Shanghai Noon
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
6.8
Emil and the Detectives
(1964)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Team America: World Police
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
7.4
Lethal Weapon
(1987)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Center
7.0
Puss in Boots
(2011)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Female Combat: Yes
Progressive
7.3
Marvel Rising: Secret Warriors
(2018)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: High
Female Combat: Yes
Traditional
6.5
Smokey and the Bandit
(1977)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Center
7.7
Men in Black
(1997)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
8.4
The General
(1926)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
The In-Laws
(1979)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low