6.7
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Intolerable Cruelty (2003)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Traditional
Viewer Rating
Rating: 6.7
Overview
A revenge-seeking gold digger marries a womanizing Beverly Hills lawyer with the intention of making a killing in the divorce.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Overview
A revenge-seeking gold digger marries a womanizing Beverly Hills lawyer with the intention of making a killing in the divorce.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Traditional
Primary
The film satirizes universal human flaws like greed and the absurdities of the legal system, focusing on individual folly rather than promoting a specific political ideology or offering an ideologically-driven solution.
The film 'Intolerable Cruelty' features a largely traditional cast without explicit DEI-driven race or gender swaps. Its narrative focuses on satire of marriage and the legal system, rather than offering a critical portrayal of traditional identities through a DEI lens.
Secondary
The film includes minor LGBTQ+ characters whose identities are primarily used for stereotypical comedic effect. The effeminate baron and the knitting hitman with a male partner are presented as caricatures, contributing to a portrayal that leans into problematic stereotypes rather than offering dignity or complexity.
The film "Intolerable Cruelty" does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. Consequently, there is no portrayal of transsexual identity to evaluate within the narrative.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Intolerable Cruelty is an original film with characters created specifically for this production. There is no prior source material, historical record, or previous installment from which characters' genders could have been established and subsequently swapped.
Intolerable Cruelty is an original screenplay, not an adaptation of existing material or a biopic. All characters were created for this film, thus lacking any prior canonical or historical race to be altered.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
6.3
5.9
Critic Ratings
7.6
7.1
More Like This
Leans Traditional
7.1
Confessions of a Dangerous Mind
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
Raising Arizona
(1987)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Hail, Caesar!
(2016)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
7.8
The Big Lebowski
(1998)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
Guys and Dolls
(1955)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
The Mask
(1994)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.2
Ball of Fire
(1941)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
How to Steal a Million
(1966)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Up in the Air
(2009)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Burn After Reading
(2008)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
Barton Fink
(1991)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
Fargo
(1996)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
The Man Who Wasn't There
(2001)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
Miller's Crossing
(1990)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Lethal Weapon
(1987)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
6.8
The Matador
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
8.4
Sideways
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.1
The Sugarland Express
(1974)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.6
Risky Business
(1983)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Where the Boys Are
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low