6.8
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
A Sentimental Trip to Potatoes (1986)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Traditional
Viewer Rating
Rating: 6.8
Overview
Having entered the institute, the hero of the film, along with his new comrades, goes to the village "for potatoes". A month spent in the "open air" not only fills the life of a spoiled urban youth with interesting acquaintances and impressions, but also gives him his first love.
Starring Cast
Bias Dimensions
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Overview
Having entered the institute, the hero of the film, along with his new comrades, goes to the village "for potatoes". A month spent in the "open air" not only fills the life of a spoiled urban youth with interesting acquaintances and impressions, but also gives him his first love.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Traditional
Primary
The film's realistic and melancholic portrayal of the inefficiencies and human cost of Soviet collective farming, leading to individual disillusionment, subtly critiques a system strongly associated with left-wing economic models, thus aligning with right-leaning skepticism.
This 1986 Soviet drama features traditional casting, reflecting the prevalent demographics and filmmaking practices of its era, with no intentional race or gender swaps. The narrative focuses on individual experiences within a specific socio-political context, without engaging in critical portrayals of traditional identities or centering on modern diversity, equity, and inclusion themes.
Secondary
This film does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative focuses on a young woman's experiences on a collective farm in the Soviet Union, with no elements related to queer identity or issues.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film "Sentimentalnoe puteshestvie na kartoshku" is an original Soviet drama from 1986. Its characters were created for this specific production and do not derive from prior source material or historical figures with established genders. Therefore, no character undergoes a gender swap.
This Soviet-era drama is an adaptation of a Russian novel, featuring characters consistent with the setting and source material's implied racial background. There is no evidence of any character, canonically or historically established as one race, being portrayed as a different race.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
6.3
7.3
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
6.8
Be My Husband
(1981)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Could One Imagine?
(1981)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.7
A Black Rose Is an Emblem of Sorrow, a Red Rose an Emblem of Love
(1990)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
Courier
(1986)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
Do Not Leave...
(1989)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
Juno and Avos
(1983)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.0
A New Leaf
(1971)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
9.0
City Lights
(1931)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
5.3
Katenka
(1988)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.2
Masquerade
(2022)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
A Good Marriage
(1982)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
My Big Fat Greek Wedding
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
Two Mules for Sister Sara
(1970)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
The General
(1926)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Bram Stoker's Dracula
(1992)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
Dolls
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.3
Open Range
(2003)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.6
Notes on a Scandal
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
6.7
There's No Time for Love, Charlie Brown
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.8
Closer
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative