2.6
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Rooster-Fighting In The Royal Court (1994)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Center
Viewer Rating
Rating: 2.6
Overview
Starring Cast
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Buddhism: Positive
Overview
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Center
Primary
The film explores universal themes of power, ambition, and survival within a historical court setting, focusing on the corrupting influence of power and human nature rather than explicitly promoting a modern progressive or conservative political ideology.
The movie, likely of Chinese origin, features a cast that reflects its cultural setting, which is considered diverse when compared to a Western mainstream, but does not involve explicit DEI-driven recasting of traditionally white roles. Its narrative is expected to frame traditional identities neutrally or positively, without explicit critique.
Secondary
The film portrays Buddhist principles or figures as a source of moral wisdom, offering a contrast to the court's worldly pursuits. The narrative generally aligns with the dignity of the faith's ideals.
Based on available plot summaries and character information for 'Rooster-Fighting In The Royal Court', there are no identifiable transsexual characters or themes present in the film. Consequently, there is no portrayal to evaluate regarding its impact on transgender identity.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film is a historical drama based on the Chu-Han Contention. All major historical figures, such as Xiang Yu, Yu Ji, and Liu Bang, are portrayed with their historically established genders, with no instances of gender swapping.
The film depicts historical Chinese figures from the mid-20th century. All major characters are portrayed by actors of the same race as their historical counterparts, aligning with the film's setting and source material. No instances of race swapping were identified.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
5.2
N/A
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Progressive
7.8
Ip Man 2
(2010)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Center
7.5
Deep Sea
(2023)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Center
8.3
Hero
(2002)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Female Combat: Yes
Center
6.6
Ordinary Hero
(2022)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Center
7.6
Hachiko
(2023)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Progressive
8.4
Farewell My Concubine
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: High
LGBTQ: Positive
Center
7.1
No Man's Land
(2013)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
7.0
Lust, Caution
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
7.5
A Writer's Odyssey
(2021)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Female Combat: Yes
Center
8.1
One Second
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
6.9
Ip Man 3
(2015)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Progressive
6.9
All These Years
(2023)
Political: Center
Diversity: High
Center
8.1
House of Flying Daggers
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Female Combat: Yes
Center
7.1
Be Somebody
(2021)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Progressive
8.4
Better Days
(2019)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Progressive
7.1
Only the River Flows
(2023)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: High
LGBTQ: Neutral
Center
6.8
Mongolian Ping Pong
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Progressive
6.8
Curse of the Golden Flower
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: High
Center
6.5
The King's Avatar: For the Glory
(2019)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
7.3
After Divorce
(1996)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low