2.6
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Mexican Diplomats (1932)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Center
Viewer Rating
Rating: 2.6
Overview
By order of the Prime Minister, two hairdressers will serve as foreign diplomats for a while. Incredible adventures and fun are guaranteed.
Starring Cast
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Christianity: Negative
Overview
By order of the Prime Minister, two hairdressers will serve as foreign diplomats for a while. Incredible adventures and fun are guaranteed.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Center
Primary
The film's title, "Mexican Diplomats," suggests a focus on international relations and diplomacy, a subject generally considered neutral in political valence. Without any plot details or thematic information, it is impossible to discern any specific left or right-leaning bias, leading to a neutral rating.
The film naturally features a diverse cast due to its focus on Mexican diplomats, without explicitly recasting traditionally white roles. The narrative maintains a neutral stance regarding the critique of traditional identities or the explicit centering of DEI themes.
Secondary
The film, a product of Soviet anti-religious propaganda, satirizes the Armenian Apostolic Church and its clergy, portraying them as hypocritical, superstitious, and exploitative figures who hinder societal progress.
Based on the information provided, the film 'Mexican Diplomats' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Therefore, an evaluation of its portrayal of LGBTQ+ elements is not applicable, resulting in a 'N/A' net impact rating.
The film 'Mexican Diplomats' does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. Its narrative focuses on a group of Mexican diplomats observing the development of socialism in Soviet Armenia, with no elements related to transgender identity.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The 1932 film "Mexican Diplomats" does not appear to be an adaptation of pre-existing source material or a biopic of historical figures. All characters are presumed original to the film, meaning there are no established characters whose gender could have been swapped.
Without specific character details or source material to establish canonical or historical race for any character in this 1932 film, it is not possible to identify an instance of a race swap.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
5.2
N/A
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Progressive
6.9
Over the Hedge
(2006)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
7.4
The Muppet Christmas Carol
(1992)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
7.1
Bad Santa
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
7.1
The Sugarland Express
(1974)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
The Dinner Game
(1998)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
It's Always Fair Weather
(1955)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.8
Son of a Rich
(2019)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Center
7.6
Jerry Maguire
(1996)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Center
6.5
Let's Do It Again
(1975)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
8.1
Another Round
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
A Good Marriage
(1982)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
8.0
Yellow Submarine
(1968)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
The Good Girl
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Curious George
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Pooh's Heffalump Movie
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Progressive
6.7
The Wild Thornberrys Movie
(2002)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
6.6
Murder by Death
(1976)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Progressive
6.7
I Love You Phillip Morris
(2010)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Positive
Leans Progressive
6.6
Death Race 2000
(1975)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
Small Time Crooks
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low