4.6
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Why Did I Get Married Too? (2010)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Viewer Rating
Rating: 4.6
Overview
Four couples reunite for their annual vacation in order to socialize and to spend time analyzing their marriages. Their intimate week in the Bahamas is disrupted by the arrival of an ex-husband determined to win back his recently remarried wife.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Fandango
Powered byBias Dimensions
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Christianity: Positive
Overview
Four couples reunite for their annual vacation in order to socialize and to spend time analyzing their marriages. Their intimate week in the Bahamas is disrupted by the arrival of an ex-husband determined to win back his recently remarried wife.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Fandango
Powered byDetailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film leans right-of-center by emphasizing individual responsibility, commitment, and forgiveness as the primary solutions to marital problems, thereby reinforcing traditional social values surrounding the institution of marriage.
The movie showcases a predominantly Black cast, reflecting a diverse representation. Its narrative centers on the personal relationship challenges of these characters, without explicitly critiquing traditional identities or making broader DEI themes central to its plot.
Secondary
The film consistently portrays Christian faith, prayer, and church community as foundational for its characters, offering solace, guidance, and a path to reconciliation and personal growth amidst marital strife and tragedy. The narrative aligns with the virtues and dignity of the faith, presenting it as a source of strength and moral compass.
The film "Why Did I Get Married Too?" primarily focuses on the marital challenges and relationships of four heterosexual couples. There are no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes present within the narrative, leading to a determination of N/A for LGBTQ+ portrayal.
This film does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The plot centers entirely on the relationship dynamics and struggles of heterosexual couples, leading to a determination of N/A for transsexual portrayal.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This film is a direct sequel to an original story, not an adaptation of pre-existing material or a reboot of legacy characters. The characters' genders were established in the first installment and maintained in this film, with no changes from any prior canon or historical record.
This film is a direct sequel to an original story, with characters maintaining the race established in the prior installment. It is not an adaptation of pre-existing material or a historical account, thus no race swaps occurred.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
4.8
6.5
Critic Ratings
2.7
4.3
More Like This
Traditional
8.2
Forrest Gump
(1994)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Garden State
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
6.9
Where the Boys Are
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.1
Sleepless in Seattle
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Groundhog Day
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
High Fidelity
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
9.0
City Lights
(1931)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.6
Risky Business
(1983)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Meet the Parents
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Big
(1988)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.5
Meet Me in St. Louis
(1944)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.5
Pretty Woman
(1990)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
There's No Time for Love, Charlie Brown
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
To Be or Not to Be
(1942)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
It's Always Fair Weather
(1955)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
The Grass Is Greener
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
The General
(1926)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.0
A New Leaf
(1971)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
Sideways
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.3
There's Something About Mary
(1998)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative