5.4
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Cade: The Tortured Crossing (2023)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Viewer Rating
Rating: 5.4
Overview
An identical twin restores an old mental asylum, where he takes it upon himself to mystically train the patients as warriors for humanity and justice.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Bias Dimensions
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Overview
An identical twin restores an old mental asylum, where he takes it upon himself to mystically train the patients as warriors for humanity and justice.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film's central thesis promotes a radical anti-establishment ideology, characterized by deep distrust of government and corporate institutions, and champions an individualistic, vigilante solution to systemic corruption, aligning with right-leaning libertarian and populist perspectives.
The film features a cast with visible racial diversity, though it does not explicitly foreground or emphasize identity-based issues within its narrative. While themes of systemic corruption and mental health exploitation are present, their treatment is allegorical and plot-driven rather than a direct or nuanced engagement with specific DEI topics or a critique of traditional identities.
Secondary
Cade: The Tortured Crossing does not portray or focus on the LGBTQ+ community within its narrative or themes. The film centers on a conspiracy involving mental illness and supernatural abilities, with no discernible LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or representation. Therefore, the net impact on LGBTQ+ portrayal is N/A.
No information is available regarding the portrayal of transsexual characters or themes in 'Cade: The Tortured Crossing'. The film's content concerning this community cannot be evaluated due to a lack of data, resulting in an N/A rating for its depiction.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film features original characters with no known prior source material or historical record to establish a canonical gender. All characters are portrayed consistently with their presented genders in the film, thus no gender swaps occur.
The film features original characters not based on prior source material, meaning no character had a pre-established race to be altered. The diverse casting for these original roles in a contemporary setting does not meet the definition of a race swap.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
5.2
5.5
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
8.0
Twelve Monkeys
(1995)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.8
Limitless
(2011)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.8
Signs
(2002)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Traditional
9.1
Psycho
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
8.4
The Big Sleep
(1946)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Marnie
(1964)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Primal Fear
(1996)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
6.9
Darkman
(1990)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.0
Blue Velvet
(1986)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
Spellbound
(1945)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
The Occupant
(2025)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Murder by Death
(1976)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
8.6
The Terminator
(1984)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.5
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
The Prestige
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Harper
(1966)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
All the President's Men
(1976)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
Invasion of the Body Snatchers
(1956)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Enigma
(2001)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
War of the Worlds
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low