Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Lomas, a talented photographer specializing in wildlife and hunting subjects, turned his hand to filming for Charles Urban, making several trips to the Far East, including Borneo. Here he is in Ceylon, showing mahouts bathing their elephants.
Lomas, a talented photographer specializing in wildlife and hunting subjects, turned his hand to filming for Charles Urban, making several trips to the Far East, including Borneo. Here he is in Ceylon, showing mahouts bathing their elephants.
The film is a purely observational piece depicting elephants in their natural habitat, lacking any narrative, conflict, or explicit message that could be interpreted as promoting a specific political ideology.
This film, which focuses on elephants in their natural environment, does not feature human characters or a narrative. Consequently, the criteria for evaluating human representation, casting diversity, or the framing of traditional identities and DEI themes are not applicable to its content.
Without any plot details or character descriptions for 'Elephants Bathing in Ceylon River', an evaluation of its LGBTQ+ portrayal is not possible. Therefore, it is categorized as N/A due to a lack of identifiable content.
This short documentary exclusively depicts elephants bathing in a river in Ceylon. It does not feature any human characters, dialogue, or narrative themes, and therefore contains no portrayal of transsexual individuals or related topics.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This 1904 film is a short, observational documentary depicting elephants. It does not feature named or plot-relevant human characters with established canonical or historical genders, thus the concept of a gender swap does not apply.
This 1904 film is a short, non-narrative piece depicting elephants. It does not feature named human characters with established racial identities from source material or history, making the concept of a race swap inapplicable.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources