Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

Extraordinary Attorney Woo (2022)
With a genius-level IQ, Woo Young-woo learns to embrace her extraordinary self while forming a tight-knit community of friends and allies.
With a genius-level IQ, Woo Young-woo learns to embrace her extraordinary self while forming a tight-knit community of friends and allies.
The film's dominant themes align with progressive values, primarily through its central focus on disability rights, challenging societal prejudice against autistic individuals, and advocating for social justice within the legal system.
The series features a diverse cast traditional to its South Korean setting. Its narrative centrally explores themes of neurodiversity, focusing on the challenges and triumphs of an attorney with autism spectrum disorder, thereby promoting understanding and inclusion of neurodivergent individuals.
Extraordinary Attorney Woo includes a significant storyline in Episode 10 focusing on a lesbian couple's fight for marriage recognition. The series portrays the couple with dignity and empathy, highlighting their genuine love and the external legal and societal challenges they face. The narrative's stance is affirming, advocating for their rights and validating their relationship despite the legal system's limitations.
The series 'Extraordinary Attorney Woo' does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The narrative primarily focuses on legal cases and the protagonist's journey as an attorney with autism, without incorporating trans-related storylines or character arcs. Therefore, there is no depiction to evaluate.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Extraordinary Attorney Woo is an original South Korean television series, not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established characters of a different gender. All characters were created for this specific show.
Extraordinary Attorney Woo is an original South Korean television series. Its characters were created specifically for this production and do not have pre-established canonical or historical racial identities from prior source material.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























