Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

Krazy Kat (1962)
A hilarious throwback collection of kooky escapades from this rare 1960s cartoon about lovable cats, mischievous mice and big mouthed pups.
A hilarious throwback collection of kooky escapades from this rare 1960s cartoon about lovable cats, mischievous mice and big mouthed pups.
The film's central subject matter, consisting of classic slapstick and absurdist character interactions, lacks any inherent political valence. It focuses on apolitical themes and does not present or champion any specific ideological problem or solution.
The animated shorts feature anthropomorphic animal characters, which means the criteria for human racial or gender diversity in casting are not applicable. The narrative focuses on slapstick comedy and character interactions, without engaging with human traditional identities or explicit DEI themes.
The 1962 animated series 'Krazy Kat' does not contain any explicit or implicit LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The show primarily focuses on the comedic interactions between Krazy Kat, Ignatz Mouse, and Offissa Pupp, without addressing gender identity or sexual orientation.
The 1962 animated series 'Krazy Kat' does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The show does not depict gender identity, transition, or the experiences of transsexual individuals, resulting in a rating of N/A according to the rubric.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The character Krazy Kat, whose gender was intentionally ambiguous and undefined in the original comic strip, is portrayed as female in the 1962 animated series. As the source material did not establish a specific gender, this does not constitute a gender swap.
The characters in "Krazy Kat" are anthropomorphic animals (a cat, a mouse, a dog) and do not possess a human race. Therefore, the concept of a "race swap" as defined, which applies to human racial categories, is not applicable to this animated series.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























