Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

Highest 2 Lowest (2025)
When a titan music mogul, widely known as having the "best ears in the business", is targeted with a ransom plot, he is jammed up in a life-or-death moral dilemma.
When a titan music mogul, widely known as having the "best ears in the business", is targeted with a ransom plot, he is jammed up in a life-or-death moral dilemma.
The film explicitly critiques systemic wealth disparity and economic inequality, framing criminal action as a response to desperation and challenging the moral authority of the wealthy, aligning with progressive ideology.
This film demonstrates significant diversity, equity, and inclusion through its explicit recasting of central roles with Black actors in a remake of a Japanese classic. The narrative explores complex themes of class, wealth, and the corruption of capitalism through the lens of a Black protagonist navigating a multicultural New York City, without explicitly critiquing traditional identities.
The film is a contemporary reinterpretation of Akira Kurosawa's 1963 Japanese crime thriller *High and Low*. The original Japanese characters are now portrayed by a predominantly Black and some white cast, constituting a race swap for the main roles.
The film 'Highest 2 Lowest, 2025' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Based on available information, there are no explicit queer identities, relationships, or related plot elements present in the narrative or among the cast.
The film "Highest 2 Lowest" does not feature any transsexual characters or themes. Reviews and plot summaries indicate no depiction of transsexual topics, gender transformation, or related ideas, leading to an N/A rating for its portrayal.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film is a contemporary reinterpretation of Akira Kurosawa's "High and Low" (1963). All named characters in this adaptation maintain the same gender as their established counterparts in the original source material.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























