5.5
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
What a Way to Go! (1964)
What a Way to Go! (1964)
Overview
A four-time widow discusses her four marriages, in which all of her husbands became incredibly rich and died prematurely because of their drive to be rich.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Viewer Rating
5.5
Overview
A four-time widow discusses her four marriages, in which all of her husbands became incredibly rich and died prematurely because of their drive to be rich.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film satirizes the pursuit of extreme wealth and materialism, presenting it as a hindrance to genuine happiness. Its focus on an individual's struggle for a simple life and authentic love, rather than a systemic critique, positions its themes as largely apolitical.
This 1964 Hollywood comedy features a predominantly white cast typical of its era, with no intentional race or gender swaps of traditional roles. The narrative focuses on a satirical look at wealth and marriage, without explicitly critiquing traditional identities or incorporating DEI themes into its central plot.
Secondary
The film "What a Way to Go!" is a 1964 black comedy focusing on a woman's series of marriages to wealthy men and her subsequent widowhood. There are no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes present in the narrative, leading to a determination of N/A for LGBTQ+ portrayal.
The film "What a Way to Go!" (1964) does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. Its plot revolves around a woman's comedic and tragic experiences with multiple marriages and sudden wealth, with no elements related to transgender identity.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This 1964 film is an original story and not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established characters, nor does it feature historical figures. Therefore, no characters could have undergone a gender swap from prior canonical or historical representations.
This 1964 film is an original production and does not adapt characters from prior source material or depict historical figures with established racial identities. Therefore, no race swaps occurred.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
6.9
7.1
Critic Ratings
2.5
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
6.7
The Grass Is Greener
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.5
In Her Shoes
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.8
The Apartment
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.1
Irma la Douce
(1963)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.2
Forrest Gump
(1994)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
Knocked Up
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
Shall We Dance
(1937)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
Roman Holiday
(1953)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.3
Manhattan
(1979)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
7.9
High Fidelity
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
The General
(1926)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.4
Meet Me in St. Louis
(1944)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
Enchanted
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Groundhog Day
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
When Harry Met Sally...
(1989)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
Guys and Dolls
(1955)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Maggie Simpson in "Playdate with Destiny"
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.5
The Hustler
(1961)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
8.5
The Sting
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.5
Pretty Woman
(1990)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low