4.6
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Why Did I Get Married Too? (2010)
Why Did I Get Married Too? (2010)
Overview
Four couples reunite for their annual vacation in order to socialize and to spend time analyzing their marriages. Their intimate week in the Bahamas is disrupted by the arrival of an ex-husband determined to win back his recently remarried wife.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Fandango
Powered byRating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Christianity: Positive
Viewer Rating
4.6
Overview
Four couples reunite for their annual vacation in order to socialize and to spend time analyzing their marriages. Their intimate week in the Bahamas is disrupted by the arrival of an ex-husband determined to win back his recently remarried wife.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Fandango
Powered byDetailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film's central conflict revolves around marital issues, and its championed solutions emphasize personal accountability, forgiveness, and renewed commitment to traditional marriage, aligning with conservative social values.
The movie showcases a predominantly Black cast, reflecting a diverse representation. Its narrative centers on the personal relationship challenges of these characters, without explicitly critiquing traditional identities or making broader DEI themes central to its plot.
Secondary
The film consistently portrays Christian faith, prayer, and church community as foundational for its characters, offering solace, guidance, and a path to reconciliation and personal growth amidst marital strife and tragedy. The narrative aligns with the virtues and dignity of the faith, presenting it as a source of strength and moral compass.
The film "Why Did I Get Married Too?" primarily focuses on the marital challenges and relationships of four heterosexual couples. There are no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes present within the narrative, leading to a determination of N/A for LGBTQ+ portrayal.
This film does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The plot centers entirely on the relationship dynamics and struggles of heterosexual couples, leading to a determination of N/A for transsexual portrayal.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This film is a direct sequel to an original story, not an adaptation of pre-existing material or a reboot of legacy characters. The characters' genders were established in the first installment and maintained in this film, with no changes from any prior canon or historical record.
This film is a direct sequel to an original story, with characters maintaining the race established in the prior installment. It is not an adaptation of pre-existing material or a historical account, thus no race swaps occurred.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
4.8
6.5
Critic Ratings
2.7
4.3
More Like This
Leans Traditional
6.9
Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day
(2008)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
7.6
Guys and Dolls
(1955)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.1
Irma la Douce
(1963)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
The Band Wagon
(1953)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
Metropolitan
(1990)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
(500) Days of Summer
(2009)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.0
An American in Paris
(1951)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
The General
(1926)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
Operation Petticoat
(1959)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
Sideways
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.1
Plus One at an Amish Wedding
(2022)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying
(1967)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.9
Holiday Inn
(1942)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
Girl Shy
(1924)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Being Julia
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Maggie Simpson in "Playdate with Destiny"
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
Lost in Translation
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
The Mask
(1994)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.6
Top Hat
(1935)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Romance
(1962)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low