Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
When an abused wife grows to giant size because of an alien encounter and an aborted murder attempt, she goes after her cheating husband with revenge on her mind.
When an abused wife grows to giant size because of an alien encounter and an aborted murder attempt, she goes after her cheating husband with revenge on her mind.
The film's left-leaning rating is primarily due to its central critique of male infidelity and patriarchal control, which fuels the protagonist's monstrous transformation and rampage, aligning with themes of female empowerment and societal injustice.
The movie features a predominantly white cast, reflecting the traditional casting norms of its era. However, its narrative explicitly critiques a traditional male identity through the negative portrayal of the protagonist's unfaithful husband, whose actions directly drive the central conflict and the protagonist's transformation.
The film "Attack of the 50 Foot Woman" does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its narrative centers on heterosexual relationships, gender dynamics of the era, and sci-fi horror elements, thus rendering the portrayal of LGBTQ+ elements as N/A.
The film "Attack of the 50 Foot Woman" (1958) does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The narrative centers on a cisgender woman's transformation and quest for revenge, with no elements related to transgender identity or experience.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This film is an original production from 1958, not an adaptation of existing source material, a reboot, or a biopic. All characters were created for this specific film, meaning there are no pre-established characters whose gender could have been altered.
This 1958 film is an original production and not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established character races. Therefore, no character's race was altered from a prior canonical or historical depiction.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources