Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

An inventive use of slow-motion filming helps hammer home the gag as an unconvincing 'Indian chief' hopes to dissolve some trapped wind with a popular brand of indigestion powder.
An inventive use of slow-motion filming helps hammer home the gag as an unconvincing 'Indian chief' hopes to dissolve some trapped wind with a popular brand of indigestion powder.
The film's core subject matter is apolitical slapstick comedy centered around a prank, and its narrative does not engage with or promote any specific political ideology.
This early silent film features traditional casting practices of its era, where a non-white character role would have been played by a white actor, without any intentional DEI-driven casting. The narrative frames traditional identities neutrally or positively, while the non-white character is presented stereotypically and as the subject of ridicule, indicating an absence of DEI themes or critique.
This early silent film is a simple gag comedy depicting a man's humorous reaction to a fizzy drink. There are no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or plot points present in the narrative, leading to a determination of N/A for LGBTQ+ portrayal.
This early comedic film, released in 1901, depicts an Indian Chief's humorous physical reaction to a fizzy drink. Its brief narrative contains no identifiable transsexual characters, themes, or related portrayals, resulting in an N/A rating for this evaluation.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This early trick film from 1901 features original characters without any prior canonical, historical, or widely established gender. Therefore, no gender swap can be identified.
This 1901 film is an original production, not an adaptation or a biopic. Its characters, including 'The Indian Chief,' do not have a prior established race from source material, previous installments, or real-world history that predates this film. Therefore, no race swap can be identified.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























