Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

Double Dare (1986)
Two teams compete to win cash and prizes by answering trivia questions and completing messy 'physical challenges' on Double Dare.
Two teams compete to win cash and prizes by answering trivia questions and completing messy 'physical challenges' on Double Dare.
The film documents the lives of female stunt performers, highlighting their challenges and successes in a male-dominated field. While the subject touches on gender dynamics, the narrative focuses on individual perseverance, skill, and the craft of stunt work, rather than explicitly promoting a political agenda or systemic critique, leading to a neutral rating.
This documentary explores the careers of two white women in the male-dominated Hollywood stunt industry, bringing gender equity and the challenges faced by women in traditional fields to the forefront of its narrative. While the film's primary subjects are not diverse in terms of race, its core focus is on gender-related DEI themes.
As a competitive game show, 'Double Dare' does not feature narrative elements, characters, or themes that would include LGBTQ+ representation. Therefore, there is no identifiable portrayal of LGBTQ+ individuals or themes within the program.
The children's game show 'Double Dare' does not include any transgender characters or themes, as its format focuses on physical challenges and trivia. Therefore, there is no portrayal of transsexual individuals or related narratives within the series.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Double Dare (1986) is a game show format. It does not feature fictional characters with established canonical genders from source material or prior installments that could be gender-swapped. The hosts and contestants are not legacy characters subject to gender reinterpretation.
Double Dare (1986) is a game show featuring real contestants and a host. It does not contain fictional characters with established canonical races from source material, making the concept of a 'race swap' inapplicable.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























