Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

A Woman Rebels (1936)
A defiant young woman struggles against the norms and morals established by Victorian society and enforced by her autocratic father.
A defiant young woman struggles against the norms and morals established by Victorian society and enforced by her autocratic father.
The film explicitly promotes progressive ideology by centering on a woman's rebellion against restrictive Victorian societal norms, championing female independence, career aspirations, and challenging the stigma of single motherhood. Its core conflict and solution directly critique systemic limitations placed upon women.
The movie features traditional casting reflective of its historical context. However, its narrative strongly critiques traditional male dominance and societal gender roles, focusing on a woman's rebellion and advocacy for women's rights.
The film critiques the rigid, patriarchal, and hypocritical aspects of Victorian Christian morality and its societal institutions. It portrays these elements as oppressive forces against women's independence and dignity, with the narrative aligning with the protagonist's rebellion against such norms.
A Woman Rebels is a historical drama focused on a woman's fight for independence in Victorian society. The narrative does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or explore related themes, thus there is no portrayal to evaluate.
The film "A Woman Rebels" focuses on a cisgender woman's struggle for independence and women's rights in Victorian England. There are no identifiable transsexual characters or themes present in the narrative, nor does it touch upon gender identity beyond cisgender experiences.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This 1936 film is an adaptation of Netta Syrett's 1895 novel "Portrait of a Lady." The characters' genders in the film align with their established genders in the original source material, with no instances of a character being portrayed as a different gender.
Based on the 1936 film adaptation of a Victorian-era novel, there is no indication that any character canonically, historically, or widely established as one race was portrayed as a different race. The casting aligns with the source material's implied racial context.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























