Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

Breathing In (2023)
1901, South Africa. As the Second Anglo-Boer War rages on, a wounded General seeks refuge in the small home of a woman and her young daughter. As the hurt man settles in, he begins noticing that something is off about the two women, particularly the daughter, and before long, he’ll learn the real reason for why they’ve invited him and for how they’ve survived on their own for so long.
1901, South Africa. As the Second Anglo-Boer War rages on, a wounded General seeks refuge in the small home of a woman and her young daughter. As the hurt man settles in, he begins noticing that something is off about the two women, particularly the daughter, and before long, he’ll learn the real reason for why they’ve invited him and for how they’ve survived on their own for so long.
The film explores psychological suspense and isolation through its narrative of a young woman caring for a reclusive elder in a remote setting. Its focus on individual trauma and the unknown positions it as a largely apolitical examination of human fear and mental fragility.
A comprehensive evaluation of diversity, equity, and inclusion characteristics for this film is not possible without further details regarding its narrative and character portrayals.
There is not enough publicly available information for AI to assess this category for this movie.
There is not enough publicly available information for AI to assess this category for this movie.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
There is not enough publicly available information for AI to assess this category for this movie.
The film features original characters without prior established racial identities in any source material or historical context. No characters were previously depicted as a different race in prior canon. Therefore, no instances of race swapping are present.
There is not enough publicly available information for AI to assess this category for this movie.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























