Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Drama, Fantasy • 1969 • 129 min • Adults (18+)

Fellini's 1969 adaptation of Petronius's ancient Roman novel follows two young men drifting through a grotesque, dreamlike empire, chasing the same boy-lover across feasts, shipwrecks, and spectacles of excess. The film lands Neutral despite its aggressively progressive content on family and sexuality, because it pursues no political agenda. Same-sex desire, fluid partnerships, and the total absence of conventional family life are simply the furniture of a decaying civilization. Fellini observes rather than advocates. The film critiques Roman decadence as universal human folly, not as a platform for modern identity politics or conservative nostalgia. The result is a work that pulls hard in one direction culturally, then undercuts any clear message by treating everything with equal, detached surrealism.
Martin Potter • Hiram Keller • Max Born
Fellini's 1969 adaptation of Petronius's ancient Roman novel follows two young men drifting through a grotesque, dreamlike empire, chasing the same boy-lover across feasts, shipwrecks, and spectacles of excess. The film lands Neutral despite its aggressively progressive content on family and sexuality, because it pursues no political agenda. Same-sex desire, fluid partnerships, and the total absence of conventional family life are simply the furniture of a decaying civilization. Fellini observes rather than advocates. The film critiques Roman decadence as universal human folly, not as a platform for modern identity politics or conservative nostalgia. The result is a work that pulls hard in one direction culturally, then undercuts any clear message by treating everything with equal, detached surrealism.
Martin Potter • Hiram Keller • Max Born
The film offers a sprawling, surreal critique of societal decadence and moral emptiness without explicitly promoting a specific political ideology or offering a clear solution. Its focus is on the universal aspects of human excess and the cyclical nature of decline.
The film utilizes casting traditional for its ancient Roman setting and production era. However, its narrative explicitly critiques traditional power structures and societal decadence, portraying male figures and the Roman elite in a negative light, and prominently featuring non-normative sexualities as part of its societal depiction.
Satyricon depicts a sexually fluid ancient Roman society where same-sex relationships, particularly the central love triangle between Encolpius, Ascyltus, and Giton, are integral to the plot. These relationships are presented as a natural part of the characters' lives and the societal landscape, without the film explicitly affirming or denigrating queer identity. The portrayal is observational, reflecting the era's hedonism rather than offering modern commentary.
Fellini's Satyricon features characters who exhibit gender non-conformity and fluidity, such as effeminate men and eunuchs, as part of its depiction of a decadent ancient Roman society. These portrayals are incidental to the broader narrative of excess and moral ambiguity. The film neither affirms nor denigrates these identities, presenting them as elements within a chaotic world without specific positive or negative commentary on their nature. For example, the effeminate character Giton is simply part of the protagonist's tumultuous relationships.
The film portrays a society where traditional family structures, lifelong marriage, distinct gender roles, and parental authority are virtually absent or depicted as grotesque parodies. It normalizes fluid relationships, sexual freedom, and chosen, transient partnerships, presenting a world entirely devoid of traditional family values.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film adapts Petronius's ancient Roman novel. All major and named characters whose gender was established in the source material maintain that same gender in Fellini's adaptation. No character canonically or historically established as one gender is portrayed as a different gender.
The film adapts an ancient Roman novel. All major characters, canonically established as ancient Romans (implicitly white/Mediterranean), are portrayed by actors who are also white, consistent with the source material and historical context.
Not depicted in the film.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























