Traditional
8.4
Ben-Hur
(1959)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Soldiers of Fortune (1914)
Soldiers of Fortune (1914)
Overview
Starring Cast
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Viewer Rating
Not Rated
Overview
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film's narrative centers on the practicalities and action of private military operations, emphasizing individual skill and mission accomplishment rather than explicitly endorsing or critiquing specific political ideologies or systemic issues, leading to a neutral political stance.
This film, produced in 1919, features traditional casting with no apparent intentional race or gender swaps of roles. Its narrative is also expected to frame traditional identities neutrally or positively, without explicit DEI critiques, reflecting the common cinematic practices of its time.
Secondary
The film 'Soldiers of Fortune' (1919) does not include any discernible LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its narrative focuses on adventure and romance without engaging with queer identities or experiences, resulting in no portrayal to evaluate.
The 1914 silent film 'Soldiers of Fortune' does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. Its narrative, typical of early 20th-century cinema, focuses on adventure, romance, and political intrigue without addressing gender identity.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The 1914 film "Soldiers of Fortune" is an adaptation of Richard Harding Davis's 1897 novel. A review of the main characters and their portrayals in the film indicates that all significant roles maintained the same gender as established in the original source material. No instances of a character canonically established as one gender being portrayed as a different gender were found.
The 1914 film adaptation of Richard Harding Davis's novel does not feature any characters whose race was explicitly established in the source material as different from their on-screen portrayal. The racial depictions of characters from the fictional South American country were not unambiguously defined in the original novel.
More Like This
Leans Traditional
8.1
Groundhog Day
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
The African Queen
(1952)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
Mean Streets
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.1
The Birth of a Nation
(1915)
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Lolita
(1962)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
The Sting
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.8
The Apartment
(1960)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Brothers
(2009)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
The Elephant Man
(1980)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
Roman Holiday
(1953)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
The War of the Roses
(1989)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
When Harry Met Sally...
(1989)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.8
Closer
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Traditional
7.9
Jeremiah Johnson
(1972)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
When I Grow Up
(1951)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
The Surrender
(2025)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.5
High Noon
(1952)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
The World's Fastest Indian
(2005)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Positive
Traditional
7.3
Seabiscuit
(2003)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low