3.0
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Tourists Starting for Canton (1900)
Tourists Starting for Canton (1900)
Overview
Shows a party of English people in their chairs. This is the only safe way of getting about in Canton, as the streets are indescribably filthy.
Starring Cast
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Center
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Viewer Rating
3.0
Overview
Shows a party of English people in their chairs. This is the only safe way of getting about in Canton, as the streets are indescribably filthy.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Center
Primary
The film's subject matter, "Tourists Starting for Canton," is inherently apolitical, focusing on the observational documentation of travel rather than presenting a political problem or solution.
This 1903 documentary short depicts tourists and locals in Canton, China. Its representation reflects the natural diversity of the setting without intentional casting choices for fictional roles. The narrative is a straightforward observation, devoid of any explicit critique of traditional identities or overt DEI themes.
Secondary
This early 20th-century documentary short, depicting a public scene of tourists in Canton, does not feature any discernible LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its non-narrative nature and historical context preclude such portrayals, resulting in no identifiable LGBTQ+ content.
The film "Tourists Starting for Canton" is a very short, early documentary-style film depicting a travel scene. It does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes, and therefore offers no portrayal of transsexual identity.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This 1900 documentary-style film depicts unnamed tourists and local people. As there are no established characters from prior canon or history, the concept of a gender swap does not apply.
This 1900 film is a very early, likely documentary-style production. There are no established characters from source material, prior films, or historical records whose race could be canonically defined and subsequently altered. Therefore, no race swap occurs.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
3.1
3.0
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
8.4
Six Into One: The Prisoner File
(1984)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
7.0
On the Road with: Scarecrow
(1973)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Center
7.9
Roadrunner: A Film About Anthony Bourdain
(2021)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Progressive
6.7
Titan: The OceanGate Submersible Disaster
(2025)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: High
Leans Progressive
7.2
Piece by Piece
(2024)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
6.7
Funke
(2018)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
8.6
Walt Whitman: Poet for a New Age
(1971)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Positive
Leans Traditional
6.6
He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not
(1903)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
9.0
The Unanswered Question VI : The Poetry of Earth
(1976)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Progressive
8.1
Hidden Heroes
(1999)
Political: Center
Diversity: Not Rated
Center
7.7
Sinbad: Brain Damaged
(1991)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Traditional
7.5
What Is a Woman?
(2022)
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Progressive
8.3
Black Box Diaries
(2024)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: High
Leans Traditional
6.8
Egy Kerecsen Solyom Törtenete
(1951)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Progressive
7.7
Maya Lin: A Strong Clear Vision
(1995)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: High
Leans Traditional
9.0
The Unanswered Question III : Musical Semantics
(1976)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Progressive
8.2
Moonage Daydream
(2022)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Positive
Center
8.0
Are We Good?
(2025)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Center
7.0
The Unanswered Question V : The Twentieth Century Crisis
(1976)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
7.8
Look at Life: In the Honours List
(1969)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low