Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Lack-lustred and alcoholic Pratap Narayan Tilak is given a rude awakening when he meets with journalist Megha Dixit, and decides to instill some sense of justice and fair play within his community, and get them to assertively defend their rights and freedom. He is met with strong resistance, both from within his very own community, the police, and some very powerful and influential politicians. Unable to bear the injustice, and frustrated at his community to act proactively, Pratap decides to take the law into his own hands, resulting in chaos, violence, and uncertainty for everyone, and a path to his own grave.
Lack-lustred and alcoholic Pratap Narayan Tilak is given a rude awakening when he meets with journalist Megha Dixit, and decides to instill some sense of justice and fair play within his community, and get them to assertively defend their rights and freedom. He is met with strong resistance, both from within his very own community, the police, and some very powerful and influential politicians. Unable to bear the injustice, and frustrated at his community to act proactively, Pratap decides to take the law into his own hands, resulting in chaos, violence, and uncertainty for everyone, and a path to his own grave.
The film critiques systemic corruption and injustice but champions a solution rooted in individual vigilante action and strongman leadership, bypassing failed state institutions. This emphasis on decisive, extra-legal force to restore order aligns with right-leaning themes of individual responsibility and skepticism of government.
The film features a cast that is diverse within its cultural context, without engaging in explicit race or gender swaps of roles traditionally defined by Western standards. Its narrative focuses on social justice and corruption, rather than explicitly critiquing traditional identities like white, male, or heterosexual roles.
The film uses Hindu cultural and religious backdrops, often portraying temples and spiritual values with respect. The protagonist's fight for justice aligns with themes of dharma, positioning the narrative to affirm righteous conduct within a Hindu societal context.
The film depicts Muslim characters as integral parts of the diverse Indian society, promoting communal harmony. It strongly condemns those who exploit religious differences, positioning the audience to sympathize with all communities against bigotry.
The film Krantiveer (1994) does not contain any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Consequently, there is no portrayal to evaluate, resulting in an N/A rating for its depiction of LGBTQ+ elements.
The film 'Krantiveer' (1994) does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. Its narrative focuses on a journalist's fight against crime and corruption, with no elements related to transgender identity or experiences present in the plot or character arcs.
The film does not feature any female characters engaging in or winning close-quarters physical combat against male opponents. Female characters like Meghna and Priya primarily fulfill roles as a journalist and a romantic interest, respectively, without participating in direct physical altercations.
Krantiveer (1994) is an original film and not an adaptation, biopic, or reboot of pre-existing characters. All characters were created for this specific movie, thus there are no prior established genders to swap.
Krantiveer (1994) is an original Indian film, not an adaptation of pre-existing material or a biopic. Therefore, no characters had a canonically or historically established race prior to this film's creation.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources