Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

Angela Anaconda (1999)
A unique style of cutout animation tells the story of eight-year-old Angela, her weird and wonderful friends, and her sworn enemy--snobby Nanette Manoir.
A unique style of cutout animation tells the story of eight-year-old Angela, her weird and wonderful friends, and her sworn enemy--snobby Nanette Manoir.
The film focuses on universal childhood experiences and the power of imagination, addressing personal challenges through individual agency rather than engaging with political or societal critiques. Its themes are largely apolitical, leading to a neutral rating.
The movie features a visibly diverse cast typical for a children's program without explicit DEI-driven casting choices. Its narrative focuses on childhood themes and does not critically portray traditional identities or center explicit DEI critiques.
'Angela Anaconda' is a children's animated series that does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The show's narrative centers on the experiences of its young protagonist and her interactions within her family, school, and social circles, without exploring queer identities or related storylines.
Angela Anaconda, a children's animated series, does not include any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The narrative focuses on the protagonist's daily life and imaginative adventures, without engaging with gender identity or transition.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Angela Anaconda is an original animated series from 1999. All characters were created for this show and do not have prior canonical genders from source material, previous installments, or real-world history to be swapped from.
Angela Anaconda is an original animated series; its characters were created for the show. There is no prior source material or historical record to establish a canonical race for any character before their depiction in the series, therefore no race swaps occurred.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























