6.4
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Resurrection (2014)
Resurrection (2014)
Overview
The people of Arcadia, Missouri are forever changed when their deceased loved ones suddenly start to reappear.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Center
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Christianity: Negative
Viewer Rating
6.4
Overview
The people of Arcadia, Missouri are forever changed when their deceased loved ones suddenly start to reappear.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Center
Primary
The film explores the human and social impact of mysterious resurrections, focusing on themes of grief, family, and the unknown. It maintains a neutral stance by prioritizing character-driven drama and mystery over explicit political commentary or ideological solutions.
The series features visible diversity in its main cast, including a prominent Black actor in a leading role. The narrative, a supernatural drama, does not appear to explicitly critique traditional identities or center DEI themes, maintaining a neutral or positive framing.
Secondary
The film depicts a serial killer motivated by a twisted interpretation of Christian resurrection, using it to justify horrific acts. The narrative links this religious concept directly to delusion and violence without offering any counterbalancing positive portrayal of the faith.
Based on available plot summaries and character descriptions for 'Resurrection, 2014', there is no identifiable presence of LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative focuses on a detective investigating a series of mysterious resurrections, without any reported LGBTQ+ elements.
The film 'Resurrection, 2014' does not feature any identifiable transgender characters or themes. Therefore, there is no portrayal of transsexual individuals or related narratives within the story.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film "Resurrection, 2014" is an original production with no specified source material, previous installments, or historical figures. Therefore, there are no pre-established characters whose gender could have been changed.
There is not enough publicly available information for AI to assess this category for this movie.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
7.2
7.3
Critic Ratings
5.3
5.9
More Like This
Leans Traditional
8.0
A Flight for a Fortune
(1914)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
9.0
Tempest and Sunshine
(1910)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
9.0
The Right to Live
(1915)
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Progressive
9.0
The Indian Changeling
(1915)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Progressive
7.1
The Battle of the Yalu
(1904)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: Moderate
Center
9.0
Not Guilty
(1910)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
10.0
Lena Rivers
(1910)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Progressive
9.4
In Trousers
(1979)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Positive
Leans Traditional
8.0
The Silent Witness
(1912)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Progressive
10.0
The Housemaid
(1915)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: Moderate
Center
10.0
The Huron Converts
(1915)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
8.0
Brimstone, the Amish Horse
(1968)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.3
Daniel Boone: The Promised Land
(1961)
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low
Center
7.0
Paul and Virginia
(1910)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
10.0
Rose Leaves
(1915)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
7.0
Burning of St. Pierre (Martinique)
(1902)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Progressive
6.9
Sheepdog
(2026)
Political: Not Rated
Diversity: Not Rated
Leans Traditional
8.9
Greta, the Misfit Greyhound
(1963)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
10.0
Rehabilitated
(1916)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
10.0
Baby Hands
(1912)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low