Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources

CN Invaded Part 3: That Darn Platypus (2007)
A platypus enrolls into CDMS, and he keeps rubbing into everyones face that he is a brain-sucking alien. Adam refuses to believe this, but the animals have reason to believe from various signs.
A platypus enrolls into CDMS, and he keeps rubbing into everyones face that he is a brain-sucking alien. Adam refuses to believe this, but the animals have reason to believe from various signs.
The film is rated as neutral due to the complete absence of plot details or thematic information that would indicate a specific political leaning, making it impossible to assess any ideological context or championed solutions.
Based on the available information, the movie does not provide explicit details regarding character diversity or narrative themes that actively critique traditional identities or center strong DEI elements. The framing appears to be neutral regarding representation and traditional in its narrative approach.
The film 'CN Invaded Part 3: That Darn Platypus' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Consequently, there is no specific portrayal of queer identity to evaluate within the narrative.
The film "CN Invaded Part 3: That Darn Platypus" does not feature any identifiable transsexual characters or themes. The narrative focuses on animated characters and plot points typical of its genre, without engaging with transgender identity in any capacity.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The segment parodies 'Doctor Who' with a platypus version of 'The Doctor.' At the time of its release (2009), The Doctor was exclusively portrayed as male, and the parody character maintains this gender. No other characters are gender-swapped from established canon.
The film is an animated short featuring established Cartoon Network characters. There is no evidence or indication that any of these animated characters were visually redesigned or portrayed as a different race than their original canonical depictions.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources























