3.4
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
God's Not Dead 2 (2016)
God's Not Dead 2 (2016)
Overview
When a high school teacher is asked a question in class about Jesus, her reasoned response lands her in deep trouble and could expel God from the public square once and for all.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Rating & Dimensions
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Traditional
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low
Christianity: Positive
Viewer Rating
3.4
Overview
When a high school teacher is asked a question in class about Jesus, her reasoned response lands her in deep trouble and could expel God from the public square once and for all.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Traditional
Primary
The film's central thesis explicitly promotes conservative ideology by dramatizing the perceived persecution of Christians in America and advocating for the unwavering public defense of Christian faith against secular forces.
The movie features a predominantly traditional cast without explicit DEI-driven casting choices. Its narrative focuses on defending traditional religious values and does not critique traditional identities, instead framing those who challenge religious expression as antagonists.
Secondary
The film unequivocally champions Christianity, portraying its adherents as righteous and persecuted, and its principles as virtuous. The narrative frames any opposition to Christianity as bigoted or misguided, positioning the audience to sympathize with the victimized faith.
God's Not Dead 2 does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The film's narrative is exclusively focused on religious freedom, the defense of Christian faith, and the alleged persecution of Christians in a secular society, leaving no room for LGBTQ+ representation.
The film "God's Not Dead 2" focuses on themes of religious freedom and the legal challenges faced by a Christian teacher. There are no identifiable transsexual characters or themes present in the narrative, leading to a determination of N/A for its portrayal.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This film is an original story within its own cinematic universe, not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established characters. All characters are original creations for the film or maintain their gender from previous installments, thus no gender swaps occur.
The film features original characters not based on pre-existing source material or historical figures. No characters from previous installments had their race changed, thus no race swaps occurred.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
4.4
6.1
Critic Ratings
1.0
2.2
More Like This
Center
7.4
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea
(1916)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.2
McFarland, USA
(2015)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
6.8
Magic Mike
(2012)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.2
The Fabelmans
(2022)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
Arthur Christmas
(2011)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.1
Neethiyin Marupakkam
(1985)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
King Richard
(2021)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Traditional
6.5
The Journey
(1959)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Desire Under the Elms
(1958)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.7
Old Henry
(2021)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
The Impossible
(2012)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.5
Sylvia Scarlett
(1935)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
8.2
The Third Woman
(1920)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
End of Watch
(2012)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
8.1
Cyrano
(1974)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Warrior
(2011)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Five Graves to Cairo
(1943)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
Argo
(2012)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
The Way
(2010)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
F1
(2025)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate